|
Objective:
Electrolytic hard chrome (EHC) plating is used extensively
by aircraft original equipment manufacturers (OEM) to impart
wear and corrosion resistance to many components. Hard chrome
plating utilizes chromium in the hexavalent state (hex-Cr),
which is a known carcinogen. As a result, the Environmental
Protection Agency has issued air and water emission standards
for chromium, and recent epidemiological studies support lowering
the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for hex-Cr, established
by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, by as
much as two orders of magnitude, which would greatly increase
the cost of chrome plating. A tri-service/OEM/private-sector
group, designated the Hard Chrome Alternatives Team (HCAT),
was formed to validate thermal spray coatings as an environmentally
acceptable, superior-performance alternative to EHC on many
different types of aircraft components.
Technology
Description:
HVOF is a standard commercial thermal spray process in which
a powder of ceramic/metal or high-temperature, oxidation-resistant
Tribaloy is injected into a supersonic flame of a fuel, usually
hydrogen, propylene or kerosene. The particles of powder soften
in the flame and form a dense, well-adhered coating on the
substrate. The coatings can be applied in the same range of
thicknesses that are used in chrome plating. A detailed technology
assessment concluded that the optimum coatings for replacing
EHC plating on propeller hub components were high-velocity
oxygen-fuel (HVOF) Tribaloy 800, a cobalt (Co)-based alloy,
and Co-cemented tungsten carbides (WC), WC (83%) / Co (17%)
and WC (86%) / Co (10%) Cr (4%).
Results:
Steel (4340) coupons were coated with WC/17Co and WC/10Co4Cr
at the Naval Aviation Depot, Cherry Point (NADEP-CP) in North
Carolina. Axial fatigue, salt-fog corrosion and sliding wear
tests showed that the performance of HVOF WC/17Co and WC/10Co4Cr
was equal to, or superior to, EHC. WC/10Co4Cr also was considered
acceptable to replace nickel-plated coatings. After a wear
rig test for one standard overhaul life, a P3 aircraft low-pitch-stop
lever sleeve coated with HVOF WC/17Co still looked pristine.
Benefits
and Implications:
This technology will result in the elimination of hex-Cr emissions,
leading to reduced toxic waste disposal and a safer working
environment. HVOF guns can coat 900 square inches per hour,
which is fifty times faster than chrome plating. The superior
performance of the HVOF coatings will lead to decreased component
repair frequency (i.e., 1.5 to 4 times longer cycle), reduced
process turnaround time, and increased readiness. A detailed
cost/benefit analysis estimated that a propeller hub overhaul
facility that processes approximately 270 components per year
would experience an annual cost increase of between $2,000
and $26,000, depending on the actual decreased repair frequency.
However, if the avoidance of scrapping difficult- and expensive-to-replace
propeller hub components and replacement of nickel plating
on propeller hubs are considered along with conversion of
other EHC processes at the facility to HVOF, a favorable positive
payback period on the necessary capital investment would be
realized. Based on the favorable materials and component tests,
the U.S. Navy is proceeding to test HVOF-coated P3 aircraft
propeller hub components under flight conditions. If successful,
it is anticipated that both NADEP-CP and Warner-Robins Air
Logistics Center will implement the technology for C-130 aircraft
propeller hubs. (Project Completed - 2004)
References:
1.
ESTCP Cost and
Performance Report. March 2004. (PDF File Format)
Principal
Investigator:
Mr.
Bruce Sartwell
Naval Research Laboratory
Code 6176
4555 Overlook Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20375
Phone: (202) 767-0722
Fax: (202) 767-3321
E-mail: sartwell@nrl.navy.mil
|